<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1713277996182" alt="Controversy at Azim Premji University: The debate over 'Annihilate Hinduism' sparks national discussion" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The recent discussions at Azim Premji University have sparked controversy and raised serious questions about the boundaries of academic discourse and the ethical responsibilities of educational institutions.
The focus of this debate revolves around the notion of "Annihilate Hinduism," a topic that has ignited a fiery debate and stirred concerns about the role of universities in fostering divisive ideologies.
Azim Premji University, situated in Karnataka, is no stranger to controversy, being situated in a region known for its blend of Islamist and Left Liberal ideologies. However, the recent discourse on "Annihilate Hinduism" has taken the spotlight, shedding light on the delicate balance between academic freedom and responsible dialogue.
The emergence of discussions advocating the annihilation of Hinduism within academic spaces has prompted a broader conversation about the role of universities as platforms for constructive dialogue and intellectual diversity. While academic freedom is crucial for the exploration of controversial ideas, it must be exercised with sensitivity and respect for diverse beliefs and identities.
The concern over the potential indoctrination of youth through such discourse is particularly troubling, as educational institutions play a significant role in shaping the worldview and values of future generations. The propagation of extremist ideologies, disguised as academic inquiry, not only undermines the credibility of academic institutions but also threatens social cohesion and harmony.
A notable incident at Azim Premji University involving Rishi Tiwari highlights the dangers of ideological intolerance and Hinduphobia within academic circles. Tiwari's ordeal, which began with a minor altercation, escalated into targeted harassment and discrimination based on his Hindu identity and affiliation with Benares Hindu University.
The social media campaign against Tiwari, coupled with the lack of fair process and swift punitive actions by the university administration, underscores the toxic environment prevailing within certain academic institutions. The rush to judgment and the absence of nuanced discussions further exacerbate polarisation and hinder meaningful dialogue.
Moreover, the issue raises questions about double standards in addressing hate speech and incitement targeting different communities. It is imperative that all forms of hate speech and discrimination, regardless of the targeted group, be unequivocally condemned and addressed with appropriate measures to uphold principles of equality and justice.
As the debate continues, it remains essential for universities to uphold academic integrity, promote inclusive discourse, and ensure that academic freedom is exercised responsibly in line with ethical standards and societal harmony.

Controversy at Azim Premji University: The debate over 'Annihilate Hinduism' sparks national discussion

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712749510607" alt="BJP candidate Khagen Murmu's campaign kiss stirs debate; TMC attacks, woman clarifies" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

BJP MP Khagen Murmu, who is also the party's Lok Sabha nominee for Bengal's North Malda constituency, sparked controversy following a photograph depicting him kissing a woman on the cheek during a campaign event.
The incident unfolded on Monday as the BJP contender canvassed in Srihipur village of Chanchal within his parliamentary jurisdiction. Images capturing Khagen Murmu's gesture circulated widely across social media platforms.
Trinamool Congress swiftly seized upon the opportunity to criticise the BJP, denouncing the act as evidence of the party's lack of respect for women.
The ruling party of Bengal also took to X to voice their disapproval, stating, "If you cannot believe what you just saw, let us clarify. Yes, this is BJP MP &amp; Maldaha Uttar candidate Khagen Murmu, kissing a woman on his own accord on his campaign trail. From MPs that sexually harass women wrestlers to leaders who make obscene songs about Bengali women, the BJP camp has no dearth of anti-women politicians. This is how Modi Ka Parivar engages in Nari Ka Samman! Imagine what they would do if they came to power.”
Dulal Sarkar, vice president of Trinamool Congress in Malda district, echoed these sentiments, condemning the incident as contrary to "Bengali culture." He pondered on the BJP's mindset post-election victory, questioning the propriety of such actions while "begging for votes."
" People will decide this," Dulal Sarkar added.
Khagen Murmu, on the other hand, defended his action, asserting that the woman is akin to "his own child."
"There is nothing wrong with kissing a child. This is a complete grassroots conspiracy. They have such bad values," the BJP candidate said.
He further announced intentions to file a complaint against Trinamool Congress concerning their remarks on the kissing episode. "Parties and individuals are being defamed by distorting such pictures," Khagen Murmu remarked.
Moreover, the woman involved in the incident also came forward to defend the BJP candidate's actions, chastising those who deemed the viral pictures inappropriate. She argued that there's no harm in a man kissing a woman as he would his daughter.
"If a man kisses a woman like his own daughter, what is the problem with that? People who are making such incidents viral on social media have a dirty mentality. Khagen Murmu loves me like a daughter. My father and mother were also present when the picture was taken," the woman said.

BJP candidate Khagen Murmu's campaign kiss stirs debate; TMC attacks, woman clarifies

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711533789512" alt="Omar Abdullah questions AFSPA promise by Amit Shah amidst Lok Sabha polls" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

National Conference (NC) leader Omar Abdullah expressed scepticism on Wednesday regarding promises to revoke the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) from Jammu and Kashmir, suggesting it might be a pre-election tactic akin to promises made and broken about including Ladakh in the 6th schedule of the Indian Constitution.
Abdullah's remarks came after reports in local media quoted Union Home Minister Amit Shah stating that the BJP-led Centre would consider revoking AFSPA from Jammu and Kashmir in due course.
“I am waiting for this day since 2011. We made a lot of efforts to remove the AFSPA (when he was the chief minister) as well, but I fear that the people of Jammu and Kashmir will be misled and cheated like the people of Ladakh were misled and cheated on the promise of the Sixth Schedule as elections are here,” Abdullah told reporters in Budgam district.
The former Union minister urged for immediate action on revoking AFSPA, citing statements by central leaders about the improved situation and the restoration of normalcy in Jammu and Kashmir.
“As far as revoking the AFSPA is concerned, start from today. When they say the situation is normal and militancy has ended and there is no separatist thought left, then what are they waiting for?” he asked.
Reports surfaced quoting Amit Shah saying that the Centre is considering the revocation of AFSPA from Jammu and Kashmir as the situation is improving, and change is underway.
During an interview with the JK Media Group, Shah also mentioned plans to reduce troop presence in the Union Territory, entrusting law and order responsibilities primarily to the Jammu and Kashmir Police.
"We have plans to pull back troops and leave law and order to the Jammu and Kashmir Police alone. Earlier, the Jammu and Kashmir police was not trusted, but today they are leading the operations," Home Minister said.
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act grants extensive powers to armed forces in disturbed areas, including search, arrest, and use of force if deemed necessary for public order maintenance. While the act has been partially lifted in northeastern states, it remains in force in Jammu and Kashmir, eliciting calls for its revocation from various quarters.

Omar Abdullah questions AFSPA promise by Amit Shah amidst Lok Sabha polls

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1709727252397" alt="Madras HC dismisses 'quo warranto' petitions against DMK leaders over remarks on Sanatan Dharma" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Madras High Court declined to issue a writ of ‘quo warranto’ in response to petitions filed by members of a Hindu nationalist group against DMK Ministers Udhayanidhi Stalin and PK Sekar Babu, along with Member of Parliament A Raja.
The ‘quo warranto’ petitions questioned the legitimacy of their official positions following comments allegedly disparaging Sanatana Dharma.
Justice Anita Sumanth disposed of the petitions brought forth by two Hindu Munnani functionaries and another individual, which raised concerns over the authority of the three DMK leaders to hold office after participating in what was described as an "anti-Sanatana Dharma meeting" and delivering speeches critical of religious practices.
While acknowledging Minister Udayanidhi Stalin's remarks equating Sanatana Dharma to diseases like HIV, AIDS, and Malaria as concerning and contrary to constitutional principles, the court ultimately dismissed the petitions.
The judge stated that individuals in positions of authority must exercise greater responsibility and verify historical facts before making public statements.
According to reports, Udhayanidhi Stalin clarified that his intention was not to belittle or disrespect any religion, but to oppose discriminatory religious practices. He underscored that Article 25 safeguards the right to practice and profess religion, including the freedom to profess atheism and hold non-belief in God.
Minister Sekar Babu refuted the plea, arguing that it was a response to his efforts to reclaim temple properties allegedly encroached upon by individuals associated with the Hindu Munnani. He asserted that the petition was driven by malicious intent. Additionally, he highlighted his involvement in a meeting advocating for the abolition of the caste system, elimination of untouchability, and promotion of social equality.
MP A Raja asserted that freedom of speech and expression supersedes freedom of religion. He contended that Article 19(1)(a) encompasses the dissemination of information and positive ideals, fostering constructive dialogue among citizens for societal progress.
On Monday, 4 March, the Supreme Court admonished Udhayanidhi Stalin for his "eradicate Sanatana Dharma" statement and questioned why he had approached the apex court with his plea after purportedly misusing his right to freedom of speech and expression.
“You abuse your right under Article 19(1)(a) (of the Constitution). You abuse your right under Article 25. Now, you are exercising your right under Article 32 (to file a plea in the Supreme Court)? Do you not know the consequences of what you said? You are not a layman, you are a minister. You should know the consequences,” the bench said, adjourning the matter to 15 March.
<ins>Background</ins>
On September 2, 2023, Tamil Nadu’s Sports Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin and Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Minister PK Sekar Babu participated in a conference organised by the Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers’ Association in Chennai, focused on the "annihilation of Sanatana Dharma."
During the event, Udhayanidhi likened Sanatana Dharma to diseases like coronavirus, malaria, dengue, and mosquitoes, advocating for its eradication. This statement sparked controversy, particularly with the BJP expressing strong opposition.
DMK MP A Raja also entered the fray, describing Sanatana Dharma as a "social disgrace."
At a protest gathering against the Vishwakarma Yojana organised by the Dravidar Kazhagam in Chennai on September 6, Raja further compared Sanatana Dharma to HIV and leprosy.

Madras HC dismisses 'quo warranto' petitions against DMK leaders over remarks on Sanatan Dharma

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1709044028232" alt="Supreme Court criticises Patanjali Ayurved for deceptive advertisements, issues contempt notice" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Supreme Court of India has heavily criticised Patanjali Ayurved for continuing to publicise deceptive advertisements promoting medicinal cures. Patanjali had committed to the Court in November the last year that such claims would stop.
Expressing initial concerns over the company's breach of its commitment, the Court issued a notice to Patanjali Ayurved and its Managing Director, Acharya Balakrishna, demanding justification for potential contempt of court.
In response to the ongoing issue, the Court prohibited Patanjali Ayurved from advertising or branding products purported to treat diseases specified under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act 1954.
Moreover, the company was cautioned against making derogatory remarks about any system of medicine. The Court scheduled a follow-up hearing in two weeks to address the matter further.
The Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah was hearing a petition filed by the Indian Medical Association which sought to curb what the latter had described as a "smear campaign" and negative advertisements targeting the vaccination drive and modern medicines.
During the proceedings, the Court also sought information from the Union Government regarding any actions taken under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act 1954 in response to Patanjali's advertisements.
"The entire country is taken for a ride! You wait for two years when the Acts says this (misleading advertisements) is prohibited," Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah told Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj.
In response to the SC judges remarks, ASG KM Nataraj stated that it is for the concerned States to take action under the Act.
When the case was taken in the morning session, Justice Amanullah strongly rebuked Patanjali for yet another advertisement that contained misleading claims. Justice Amanullah, without mincing any words, said: “Today, I am going to pass really strict order. You flout this order!”
“You had the courage and guts to come up with this advertisement after the order of this Court! And then you come up with this advertisement. Permanent relief, what do you mean by permanent relief? Is it a cure?...we are going to pass a very, very strict order. You are tempting the Court.” Judge added.
During the 2 PM session, Senior Advocate PS Patwalia, representing the Indian Medical Association, reported that the day following the Supreme Court's November 21, 2023 order, Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna of Patanjali held a press conference and reiterated misleading claims.
Patwalia also highlighted that advertisements promoting permanent cures for ailments such as diabetes, blood pressure, asthma, arthritis, and glaucoma were circulated, referencing a publication in 'The Hindu' on December 4, 2023, and YouTube links to the press conference. He further said argued that many of these conditions are explicitly listed in the Schedule to the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act.
The bench then grilled Senior Advocate Vipin Sanghi, representing Patanjali Ayurved, questioning the company's claim of providing permanent relief. Additionally, the bench raised concerns about Patanjali Ayurved's statements regarding other medicinal systems like Allopathy, reminding Sanghi of the previous order restraining comments against alternative systems.
Justice Amanullah said that there was a prima facie flouting of the Supreme Court's order and notices should be issued to Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna whose pictures were shown in the advertisements.
Responding to queries about Baba Ramdev being a sanyasi, Sanghi's remark was dismissed by Justice Amanullah, stating the importance to follow court's directives over personal identities. Patwalia criticised Sanghi's statement as "outrageous," while Justice Kohli echoed concerns over the apparent disregard for the court's order.
Initially considering a complete ban on advertisements, the bench reconsidered upon Sanghi's argument highlighting the company's diverse product portfolio. Consequently, the Court specified that the ban would apply solely to products associated with diseases listed under the Act.

Supreme Court criticises Patanjali Ayurved for deceptive advertisements, issues contempt notice

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1708950416197" alt="Allahabad HC upholds Hindu prayers in Gyanvapi Mosque's Southern Cellar, dismisses challenge" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Allahabad High Court, in a decisive ruling on Monday, upheld the continuation of Hindu prayers in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, dismissing a plea challenging the district court's directive in this matter.
Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal unequivocally dismissed two appeals lodged by the mosque management committee, which contested the Varanasi district judge's rulings. The first, dated January 17, appointed the district magistrate as the custodian of the "Vyas Tehkhana" or southern cellar of the mosque. The subsequent ruling, issued on January 31, sanctioned the performance of 'puja' within the premises.
The high court firmly affirmed that religious observances will persist in the "Vyas Tehkhana" of the mosque, which stands adjacent to the revered Kashi Vishwanath temple.
Mohammad Yasin, the joint secretary of Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, the committee entrusted with the mosque's management, disclosed that their legal team is scrutinising the judgment. They are contemplating recourse to the Supreme Court to challenge the ruling.
"After going through the entire records of the case and considering the arguments of the parties concerned, the court did not find any ground to interfere in the judgment passed by the district judge on January 17, appointing the Varanasi district magistrate as the receiver of the property, as well as the order dated January 31 by which the district court permitted puja in the tehkhana,” said Justice Agarwal while dismissing the appeals.
Going through the argument made by the Muslim side that the January 31 order was passed without any application, the high court said, “In the instant case, by order dated January 17 the composite prayer made in application was allowed, but only relief (a) was incorporated appointing receiver. Relief (b) allowing worship was added on January 31, 2024 after it was brought to the notice of the Court and order stood modified/ amended in terms of Sections 151/152 CPC.”
"I find that the challenge made to the order dated January 31 on the plea of res judicata is totally unfounded as the relief prayed by the plaintiff was granted on January 17, 2024 but part of it was not incorporated in the order which was subsequently modified/ amended," Justice Agarwal stated.
In its 54-page judgment, the court also noted, "Lastly, an attempt has been made to malign the image and impute motive to the order passed by the Court below on January 31, 2024 on the ground that the officer concerned had passed the order on the last working day.”
Justice Agrawal said that puja at that place has already been started and is going on thus there is no occasion to stop the same.
The High Court judge had reserved his verdict in the matter on February 15 after hearing the counsel for the parties.
The mosque committee had moved the High Court on February 2, hours after the Supreme Court refused to hear its plea against the district court order and asked it to approach the high court.
A survey conducted by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on the court's order had suggested that the Gyanvapi mosque was constructed during Mughal emperor Aurangzeb's rule over the remains of a Hindu temple.
The District Court ruled on January 31 that a Hindu priest can perform prayers before the idols in the southern cellar of the mosque.

Allahabad HC upholds Hindu prayers in Gyanvapi Mosque's Southern Cellar, dismisses challenge

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1708787310586" alt="BJP Leader Vanathi Srinivasan accuses TMC of blocking access to Sandeshkhali victims" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Vanathi Srinivasan, BJP leader, questioned that if the TMC government in West Bengal is transparent, why were women MPs of the saffron party prevented from visiting Sandeshkhali to meet the victims of atrocities there?
The BJP Mahila Morcha national president, on Saturday, criticised the state government over allegations of sexual abuse against women in Sandeshkhali in North 24 Parganas district and alleged that women are not safe at all under TMC rule in Bengal.
"Women are not at all safe in West Bengal. If the TMC government is so transparent, why are opposition women MPs prevented from meeting the victims in Sandeshkhali? What are they trying to hide?" she asked while speaking to reporters here.
Reacting to allegations that the BJP maintained stoic silence when similar allegations of "atrocities" were levelled in states ruled by the saffron party, she said it has never shielded anyone involved in heinous crimes.
"The BJP has never shielded anyone whenever such incidents have happened in any state ruled by the party... we have zero tolerance (towards such crimes)... but here the story is different," she claimed.
Srinivasan claimed that the ruling party in West Bengal was not taking action against its people accused of heinous crimes.
The BJP leader said that the TMC leadership is free to send its teams to Uttar Pradesh or Manipur.
"But in the name of citing the various incidents that have been happening in some other places, they cannot say why they are coming here," she said.
Srinivasan said that the BJP Mahila Morcha will take these issues to every woman of Bengal before the Lok Sabha elections.
"Sandeshkhali will be a crucial issue in the coming elections," she said.
Srinivasan said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's address of a women's rally on March 6 at Barasat in North 24 Parganas district will be shown live at more than 4,000 mahila mandals of the BJP across West Bengal.
She alleged that the TMC dispensation is protecting and safeguarding criminals who are involved in atrocities against women.
Asked about Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury also not being allowed to visit Sandeshkhali, she said that the opposition INDIA alliance was working only outside the state and not within.
"Here, they are fighting against each other," she said.

BJP Leader Vanathi Srinivasan accuses TMC of blocking access to Sandeshkhali victims

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1708775871954" alt="NCST report: TMC leader tortured tribals, took away MNREGA earnings in Sandeshkhali" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Allegations of land grab and coercive acts, including sexual assault, have surfaced against TMC leader Sheikh Shahjahan and his associates in West Bengal's Sandeshkhali, with claims that they forcibly took MNREGA wages from poor tribal families and subjected them to torture for not supporting the party, as per the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST).
According to complaints received by a three-member NCST team, led by Vice-Chairperson Ananta Nayak, the West Bengal Police purportedly "protected" Shahjahan and his accomplices. The panel, currently back in Delhi, is in the process of compiling a report to be submitted to the government.
Nayak revealed that over 50 complaints have been lodged alleging sexual harassment of tribal women and land grab by Shahjahan and his associates. The Sandeshkhali area, located in West Bengal's North 24 Parganas district, has witnessed ongoing protests against Shahjahan and his supporters for more than a month.
Shahjahan's alleged modus operandi involved coercing poor tribal individuals to surrender their MNREGA earnings, and in cases where funds were unavailable, forcing them to borrow money and surrender it to him, Nayak disclosed, expressing astonishment at the unprecedented nature of these claims.
The complainants, predominantly Hindus, informed the probe team that Shahjahan and his associates resorted to torture against those who voted for opposing parties during elections.
The NCST team uncovered instances where local women were summoned for late-night meetings, and failure to comply with Shahjahan's demands resulted in torture inflicted upon their families.
Furthermore, victims who sought police intervention were reportedly met with reluctance from law enforcement, as authorities allegedly refrained from registering FIRs or complaints, instead urging them to "negotiate" with Shahjahan, thereby backing the accused.
Complainants also alleged that Shahjahan coerced tribal families into surrendering their land, threatening to inundate fields with saltwater if met with resistance.
Nayak highlighted that Shahjahan was accused of seizing land from over a thousand tribal and non-tribal individuals across a stretch exceeding 10 kilometres.
In response to the matter, on February 20, the commission issued notices to the chief secretary of West Bengal and the state's police chief, demanding factual and action taken reports within three days.

NCST report: TMC leader tortured tribals, took away their MNREGA earnings in Sandeshkhali

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1708423898133" alt="Maharashtra Legislative Assembly unanimously passes Maratha Reservation Bill" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, also known as the lower house, unanimously approved the Maratha Reservation Bill on Tuesday. This bill aims to extend a 10 per cent reservation to the Maratha community, surpassing the 50 per cent cap.
The Chief Minister will now present the bill in the Legislative Council for final assent, following which it will be enacted into law.
Vijay Wadettiwar, the Leader of Opposition in the Maharashtra Assembly, expressed that opposition parties were in alignment with the decision to grant reservation to the Maratha community.
The state government has scheduled a one-day special session of the state legislature to table and deliberate on this crucial bill.
The legislation for the 10 per cent Maratha quota, endorsed by the government led by Eknath Shinde, bears resemblance to the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act of 2018, introduced during the tenure of the former Chief Minister, Devendra Fadnavis.
This marks the third instance in the past decade that the state has initiated legislative measures for Maratha reservation.
Chief Minister Eknath Shinde said, "I am the CM of the state and I work with the blessings of all. We don't think on the basis of caste or religion. If such a situation comes with any other community, my stand as CM will be similar to what is my stand for the Maratha community."
"We all are of similar views here on the Maratha reservation, so I will not make any political statement here," added Shinde, expressing gratitude for the cooperation extended and reaffirming his commitment to fulfilling promises made to the Maratha community.
The decision to convene a special session was prompted by Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange Patil, currently on a hunger strike in Antarwali Saarati village in Jalna district. Among his demands are Kunbi certificates for all Marathas, free education from kindergarten to postgraduate level, and reservation of seats for Marathas in government job recruitments.
The extension of reservation follows a report submitted to the state government by the Maharashtra Backward Class Commission (MBCC), led by chairman Justice (Retired) Sunil Shukre.
It's noteworthy that the state already allocates a 10 per cent quota for the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), with Marathas being the primary beneficiaries, claiming approximately 85 per cent of those allocations.
The Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission conducted an extensive survey of around 2.5 crore households within a span of nine days to assess the social and educational backwardness of the Maratha community. Based on the findings, the commission proposed a 10 per cent reservation for Marathas in both education and employment, similar to previous initiatives undertaken in 2018.
The journey towards Maratha reservation began in June 2017 when the Devendra Fadnavis government constituted the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) under the leadership of Justice (Retired) MG Gaikwad. The commission submitted its report in November 2018, affirming Marathas' status as a socially and educationally backward class (SEBC).
However, on May 5, 2021, the Supreme Court nullified reservations for the Maratha community in educational institutions and employment sectors, citing the absence of sufficient grounds to breach the 50 per cent reservation cap.

Maharashtra Legislative Assembly unanimously passes Maratha Reservation Bill

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1707911087803" alt="Infosys and Foxconn under fire: Karnataka Assembly demands local job creation" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Global companies like Infosys and Foxconn are facing criticism in Karnataka for allegedly failing to provide employment opportunities to locals, particularly farmers who relinquished their land for the establishment of these enterprises.
During a session in the Karnataka assembly on Tuesday, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA and Deputy Leader of the Opposition, Arvind Bellad, lambasted IT behemoth Infosys for purportedly not generating any employment in his constituency, Hubbali-Dharwad West.
Bellad demanded the withdrawal of land allocated to Infosys, claiming that despite acquiring 58 acres of land, the company had not created a single job opportunity. He emphasised that while Infosys had developed the campus in 2018 with a capacity to accommodate 1,400 employees, actual recruitment for a few positions was announced only in August 2022.
“In my constituency, there is an industrial estate, Infosys has taken land. They have taken 58 acres, but have not given a single job. They have just planted trees and made gardens. Take back the land from them. They talk about ethics, but they have not created jobs,” said Bellad.
He further highlighted that the government gave land to Infosys at Rs 35 lakh/acre when the market price was Rs 1.5 crore. He said that he had requested the farmers to part with the land, saying a big company like Infosys would create hundreds of jobs.
Echoing similar sentiments, Dheeraj Muniraju, BJP MLA representing Doddaballapur constituency, criticised Foxconn, the manufacturer of Apple iPhones, and Jubilant Food Works for allegedly neglecting to hire locals and farmers who lost their land due to their projects.
Muniraju expressed dissatisfaction over Foxconn's recruitment practices, accusing the company of not offering jobs to landowners and instead sending recruits to Chennai for training.
“You have given land to Foxconn, they haven’t given jobs to any farmer who lost his land. Even Jubilant FoodWorks… They have not hired a single local person. Foxconn has started hiring and they are sending the recruits to Chennai for training,” he argued.
Industries and Commerce Minister MB Patil assured the assembly that the government would take action against companies that failed to provide employment to locals who had lost their land, especially after receiving incentives.
He highlighted that companies receiving subsidies or incentives would be scrutinised, and measures could be taken, including revoking incentives or reclaiming land, if they failed to fulfil their commitments.
Patil also clarified that Foxconn was allotted 300 acres of land at a subsidised rate with the expectation of creating 50,000 jobs and manufacturing 20 million iPhones. He reiterated the government's commitment to ensuring job opportunities for farmers who had surrendered their land.
In a separate move, the government swiftly introduced a legal amendment requiring a minimum of 60% usage of Kannada language in signboards at commercial establishments, entertainment venues, and road layouts. Additionally, products manufactured within the state are mandated to include information in Kannada as well, further reinforcing the government's emphasis on promoting the regional language.

Infosys and Foxconn under fire: Karnataka Assembly demands local job creation

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1707394153120" alt="Supreme Court reserves order on sub-classification of Scheduled Castes & Tribes for reservation" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Supreme Court, on Thursday, deliberated on a crucial legal matter pertaining to whether a state government possesses the authority to enact sub-classifications within scheduled castes and scheduled tribes for the allocation of reservations in admissions and public employment.
A seven-judge constitution bench, presided over by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, listened to arguments presented by prominent legal figures including Attorney General R Venkataramani, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, and senior advocate Kapil Sibal.
The discussion revolved around revisiting the E V Chinnaiah judgement of 2004, which asserted that all scheduled caste communities, having endured centuries of ostracism, discrimination, and indignity, constitute a unified class, thereby ineligible for further sub-categorisation.
Comprising of justices BR Gavai, Vikram Nath, Bela M Trivedi, Pankaj Mithal, Manoj Misra, and Satish Chandra Mishra, the bench considered 23 petitions, notably including one led by the Punjab government contesting the 2010 ruling of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The apex court's deliberations aim to reassess a pivotal five-judge constitution bench ruling from 2004, spotlighting the case of EV Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh.
This precedent underscored the homogeneity of SCs and STs as social groups, thereby asserting that states lack the authority to further classify them to allocate reservations within reservations for the more marginalized and vulnerable castes within these communities.
The Chinnaiah judgement emphasised that any sub-classification of the Scheduled Castes would contravene Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to equality. Moreover, it delineated that only Parliament, and not state legislatures, retains the power to exclude certain castes from the Presidential List under Article 341 of the Constitution.
As the apex court ponders these legal intricacies, the outcome holds significant implications for the framework of affirmative action and social justice in India, navigating the delicate balance between constitutional provisions and the imperative to address historical injustices.

Supreme Court reserves order on sub-classification of Scheduled Castes & Tribes for reservation

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1706879852416" alt="Bengaluru Court summons TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin over 'Sanatana Dharma' remarks" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin has been summoned by the Special Court of People's Representatives in Bengaluru in connection with his controversial remarks on 'Sanatana Dharma.'
The summons comes following a complaint lodged by Bengaluru resident Paramesh, and Udhayanidhi is required to appear in person for the hearing scheduled on March 4.
Last year, Udhayanidhi Stalin, son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, sparked controversy when he likened Sanatana Dharma to "dengue" and "malaria." At a conference in September 2023, he asserted that Sanatana Dharma opposes social justice and equality, and should be "eradicated."
Despite facing criticism for his remarks, Udhayanidhi Stalin remained firm in his stance, declaring his perpetual opposition to Sanatana Dharma. Advocate Dharmapal, representing complainant Paramesh, highlighted the minister's consistent reaffirmation of his statement, emphasising his intention to face the matter in court.
Advocate Dharmapal stated, "Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin’s son Udhayanidhi Stalin partook in an event opposing Sanatana Dharma. He made a comment about Sanatana Dharma, claiming that it has to be driven out like dengue and malaria. After that, he has been sticking to the stand and reiterating the same statement. He said that he will face it in the court as well."
The court summons follows a complaint filed by Paramesh, citing the minister's comments as offensive to the sentiments of those following Hindu Dharma, especially during a time marked by increased devotion and awareness due to events like the Ram Mandir inauguration.
The court has mandated Udhayanidhi Stalin's appearance on March 4, addressing the concerns raised by the complainant.

Bengaluru Court summons TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin over 'Sanatana Dharma' remarks

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1706195428152" alt="India's 75th Republic Day Parade – A women-centric celebration & cultural extravaganza" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

As India gears up to celebrate its 75th Republic Day, the parade at Kartavya Path in the national capital is set to highlight the significant roles played by women in various sectors. The theme for this year's Republic Day is 'Viksit Bharat' and 'Bharat: Loktantra ki Matruka', symbolising the country's aspirations and its nurturing role in democracy.
The Defence Secretary, Giridhar Aramane, emphasised that women will be at the forefront of the parade, forming the majority of marching contingents and tableaux. He reiterated that the selection of themes aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision that 'India is truly a mother of democracy.'
The parade, scheduled to commence at 10:30 a.m. and last around 90 minutes, will feature several significant firsts. Notably, 100 women artists will herald the parade by playing Indian musical instruments. An all-women Tri-Service contingent will march down Kartavya Path, along with the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) contingent consisting of women personnel.
"The best representation of women will be seen in this year's Republic Day parade," affirmed the Defence Secretary.
For the third consecutive year, the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Culture will present the cultural extravaganza 'Vande Bharatam,' focusing on the theme 'Cultural expression of women power - accomplishment through resolve.' Over 1,500 female dancers will deliver a vibrant performance, conveying the message of unity in diversity.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will begin the ceremony by paying tributes to fallen heroes at the National War Memorial, followed by his presence at the saluting dais at Kartavya Path to witness the parade. The chief guest for this year's Republic Day Parade is French President Emmanuel Macron, along with a 95-member marching contingent and a 33-member band contingent from France.
Around 13,000 special guests have been invited to witness the parade, offering a diverse representation of the country. A total of 25 tableaux, representing 16 states/UTs and nine ministries/departments, will showcase India's rich cultural diversity, unity, and progress. The tableaux have been meticulously selected by an expert committee.
A unique textile installation named 'Anant Sutra - The Endless Thread' by the Ministry of Culture will be featured at Kartavya Path during the parade. It pays tribute to the saree, displaying nearly 1,900 sarees and drapes from across the country, mounted with QR codes providing details about the weaving and embroidery arts.
The Republic Day celebrations will also include the participation of beneficiaries of government schemes and achievers in Self-Help Groups (SHGs), seated opposite Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The 75th Republic Day Parade aims to be a powerful tribute to India's journey, its diversity, and the pivotal role played by women across various sectors. The celebrations will continue with the Beating Retreat ceremony on January 29, 2024, at Vijay Chowk, marking the culmination of this grand milestone in the nation's history.

India's 75th Republic Day Parade – A women-centric celebration & cultural extravaganza

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1706184055591" alt="Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami reaffirms commitment to Uniform Civil Code implementation" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami reiterated his dedication to the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), highlighting that his commitment to uniform laws for all communities in the state. The UCC proposes uniform rules for all citizens, irrespective of their religious affiliations.
Addressing a public gathering in Haridwar, CM Dhami stated, "After coming to power in the state, we pledged to implement uniform laws for all. Under the chairmanship of Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, the five-member UCC Committee has prepared the draft. This information was shared with me today itself."
He further added, "As soon as we receive the draft, we will convene a session of the Assembly and implement the Uniform Civil Code throughout the state."
The Uttarakhand Cabinet had previously approved the recommendations of the five-member panel tasked with drafting the UCC in the state during a meeting on December 22. The committee, led by retired Supreme Court judge Ranjana Prakash Desai, consists of retired Delhi High Court judge Pramod Kohli, social activist Manu Gaur, ex-chief secretary and IAS officer Shatrughan Singh, and Doon University Vice-Chancellor Surekha Dangwal.
The BJP had prominently included the enforcement of uniform civil laws in Uttarakhand in its electoral promises during the 2022 Assembly elections in the state.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, expressing his views on the nationwide rollout of the UCC, asserted that a country cannot operate on two laws and highlighted that the Uniform Civil Code aligns with the foundational principles and ideals of the Constitution.
The move in Uttarakhand reflects a broader push towards uniformity in civil laws, transcending religious boundaries.

Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami reaffirms commitment to Uniform Civil Code implementation

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1706021852581" alt="Chairpersons of 250 PACS to Attend Republic Day Parade as Special Guests" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Around 250 chairpersons of Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS) and their spouses, hailing from 24 states and two Union Territories, have been invited as "Special Guests" by the Government of India to witness the Republic Day Parade 2024 at Kartavya Path.
The Ministry of Cooperation, in collaboration with the Ministry of Defence, is hosting this special delegation, showcasing its commitment to promoting agricultural cooperatives.
As part of their visit to the capital, the Special Guests will engage with Minister of State for Cooperation BL Verma, with a special dinner scheduled for January 25. Following the Republic Day Parade, they will participate in the "Bharat Parva" event on the evening of January 26, as announced by the Ministry of Cooperation.
The Ministry aims to ensure a memorable experience for the guests and highlight the success of the ongoing "Computerization of PACS" project.
Expressing the significance of the event, the Ministry stated, "This event will inspire the participating PACS to work with renewed vigour towards realising the vision of 'Sahakar se Samriddhi'".
The initiative aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision, and under the leadership of Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Amit Shah, the Ministry of Cooperation has undertaken over 54 initiatives in a short timeframe.
Among these initiatives, the "Computerization of PACS" project stands out, with a financial outlay of Rs 2,516 crores. The ambitious project aims to computerise 63,000 PACS, with over 12,000 already computerised across 28 states and UTs.
These PACS are now integrated into the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software developed by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), marking a significant stride in the digitisation of agricultural cooperatives.

Chairpersons of 250 PACS to Attend Republic Day Parade as Special Guests

आज 14th सितम्बर को हिंदी दिवस बनाया जाता है।

पर यह हमारे इस देश की विडम्बना है की जहां पर हिंदी भाषा से सब के बीच एकता उत्पन्न होनी चाहिए, वहां पर इसी भाषा को ऐसा दिखाया जाता है की जैसे लोगों में बैर पैदा कर रही हो।&nbsp;

कभी कभी लगता है की हम आज भी गुलाम है। पर कभी कभी लगता है की देश के साथ हिंदी का भी एक सुनहरा भविष्य होगा।&nbsp;

आपके क्या विचार है?

हिंदी दिवस की हार्दिक शुभकामनायें।

Explore a variety of topics and discussions on Policharcha's Others page. Engage in conversations about miscellaneous subjects and broaden your knowledge