<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1713282298350" alt="Security forces eliminate 29 Naxals, including top leader, in Chhattisgarh's Kanker district" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

In a major development, 29 Naxals, including a prominent leader with a bounty of Rs 25 lakh on his head, were neutralised in a coordinated operation conducted by the Border Security Force (BSF) and the District Reserve Guard (DRG) on Tuesday in Chhattisgarh's Kanker district.
The deceased Naxal leader identified as Shankar Rao was a key figure within the Naxal hierarchy, adding weight to the success of the operation. The encounter, although successful in eliminating a substantial number of Naxal insurgents, resulted in injuries to three security personnel.
Authorities have confirmed the recovery of 18 bodies from the site of the skirmish, with officials anticipating that this count may rise given the ongoing assessment of the situation.
A noteworthy aspect of this operation is the retrieval of a substantial cache of weapons, including seven AK-47 rifles and three light machine guns, signalling a significant blow to the Naxal network in the region.
The engagement took place in the Maad area, a hotspot known for Naxal activity, and occurred just days before the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.
This incident underscores the persistent threat posed by Naxal groups, especially in regions like Kanker, where the security forces continue to engage in proactive measures to maintain peace and security.
As the residents of Kanker gear up for polling on April 26 in the second phase of elections, such operations assume paramount importance in ensuring a safe and conducive electoral environment.

Security forces eliminate 29 Naxals, including top leader, in Chhattisgarh's Kanker district

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1713269005066" alt="Delhi HC seeks ED's response on Daud Nasir's interim bail plea in Waqf Board money laundering case" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Delhi High Court has recently requested a response from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding the interim bail application of Daud Nasir, who is an accused in the Delhi Waqf Board money laundering case. Nasir's plea for interim bail is based on the need for his wife's surgery following an accident.
The case revolves around the acquisition of a property in Okhla worth Rs. 36 crore, with Rs. 27 crore allegedly paid in cash, suspected to be unlawfully obtained funds.
During the hearing, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma instructed the ED to submit a reply to the interim bail plea and scheduled the matter for further discussion in May. Additionally, Nasir's regular bail plea is set for consideration on May 16.
Senior advocate Ramesh Gupta, representing Nasir, highlighted that the petitioner's wife sustained a spinal injury due to an accident and requires surgery, planned for April 23.
Present during the hearing via video conferencing, Special counsel Zoheb Hossain and Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Manish Jain expressed their intent to respond to the plea.
Nasir stands accused in the Delhi Waqf Board Money Laundering case, with his previous bail application dismissed by the trial court on February 22, 2024.
The trial court's decision noted that the ED alleges Nasir confessed, under section 50 of the Act, to acquiring properties in Tikona Park, Jamia Nagar, Delhi, for Rs. 13.40 crore. When confronted with transactions from a white diary, Nasir reportedly provided evasive responses. Moreover, he admitted to signatures on a Certificate extracted from the mobile phone of accused Zeeshan Haider, relating to a property sale agreement for Rs. 36 crore.
The court highlighted the lack of explanation regarding the disparity between the sale considerations mentioned in agreements, the source of funds for property payments made by accused parties, and substantial cash transactions related to the properties.
It was further noted that while investigations into the predicate offenses are ongoing, ED has already filed a charge sheet in the matter, indicating a complex legal situation surrounding the case.

Delhi HC seeks ED's response on Daud Nasir's interim bail plea in Waqf Board money laundering case

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712832661557" alt="We are ready to shed blood for the country; CAA, UCC not acceptable, says WB CM Banerjee" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee made a firm declaration on Thursday, asserting that her state would not witness the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC), and Uniform Civil Code (UCC).
Addressing a gathering in Kolkata on the occasion of Eid-ul-Fitr, Banerjee emphasized her commitment to national unity while rejecting the contentious policies. "We are ready to shed blood for the country, but will not tolerate torture for the country. A uniform civil code is not acceptable. I want harmony among all religions. Your safety. Your life. No NRC, no CAA," she asserted.
In a direct criticism of the BJP government, Banerjee condemned what she termed as the misuse of central agencies. "If there is a blast, they (BJP) send NIA to arrest everyone. By arresting everyone, your country will become desolate. We want a beautiful sky for which everyone must stay together. If anyone comes to riot, you should keep quiet, keep your head cool," she added.
Banerjee also took the opportunity to extend Eid greetings during her address. "Eid Mubarak. It is the Eid of happiness. It is the Eid of giving strength. It is a big thing to observe this Eid by fasting for a month without drinking water," she remarked.
On social media, a post from Banerjee's official handle wished everyone a joyous Eid-ul-Fitr, hoping for happiness, peace, and prosperity for all.
Simultaneously, several other prominent leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Droupadi Murmu, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, also conveyed their wishes for Eid-al-Fitr.
Eid-ul-Fitr signifies the culmination of the holy month of Ramzan and marks the beginning of a new Islamic year, Shawwal. The observance of the moon determines the end of Ramadan and the celebration of Eid, leading to variations in its observance across different regions.

We are ready to shed blood for the country; CAA, UCC not acceptable, says WB CM Banerjee

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712756671219" alt="SC raps Uttarakhand Licensing Authority over Patanjali advertisements, warns of serious action" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Supreme Court issued a stern warning to the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for its inaction regarding misleading advertisements by Patanjali Ayurved. The court criticised the Authority for being in a "deep slumber" and accused it of attempting to delay the matter despite being informed about the misleading ads.
A bench comprising justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah questioned the Authority's motives, suggesting that it might be colluding with the respondents and deliberately ignoring the issue. The bench expressed shock at the Authority's lack of action over the past four to five years, apart from simply processing paperwork.
The court raised the possibility of suspending the officers responsible for this inaction and rebuked the Authority's counsel when they mentioned the officers' good intentions. The bench emphasised that nine months should have been sufficient for the incumbent joint director to take action, suggesting complicity on the part of their predecessor as well.
The Authority's detailed affidavit explaining its actions was not well-received by the court, which noted the disdain shown by Divya Pharmacy, a Patanjali subsidiary, towards the Authority's notices. The court warned that if it did not intervene, the Authority might neglect its duties under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, waiting for a court order to act.
The court also directed the predecessor of the current joint director and district Ayurvedic and Unani officers from Haridwar to submit affidavits explaining their inaction during their respective tenures. It criticised the officer for merely forwarding files without taking substantive action, calling it a dereliction of duty.
Refusing to accept the apologies from yoga guru Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved's managing director Balkrishna, the court deemed them superficial and stressed the seriousness of the matter. The Supreme Court is hearing a plea filed by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) regarding a smear campaign against the Covid vaccination drive and modern medicine systems.

SC raps Uttarakhand Licensing Authority over Patanjali advertisements, warns of serious action

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712748331935" alt="Kejriwal takes legal battle to Supreme Court as Delhi HC upholds his arrest" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has taken his legal battle to the Supreme Court after the Delhi High Court dismissed his plea contesting his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to the excise policy case.
The High Court's decision, made on Tuesday, deemed Kejriwal's arrest lawful, stating that the remand cannot be deemed "illegal."
In response to Kejriwal's plea, the high court held that the legality of his arrest and remand must be assessed in accordance with the law, not based on the timing of elections. The court rejected Kejriwal's argument regarding the timing of his arrest vis-a-vis the upcoming general elections, citing the absence of any malintent on the part of the ED.
<ins>What did the Delhi HC say?</ins>
In its recent ruling, the Delhi High Court underscored the non-cooperative stance of AAP leader towards the investigating agency. Despite receiving nine summonses, Kejriwal did not participate in the investigation, as noted by Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma's bench.
The court's observations, delivered while rejecting Kejriwal's plea, highlighted that his initial summon dated back to October 2023, well before India's General Elections or the implementation of the Model Code of Conduct.
Contrary to claims, Kejriwal consciously chose not to join the investigation, although he responded to all summonses. The bench pointed out that he was well-informed about the case, given the judicial custody of several co-accused in the same Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), along with his familiarity with the recorded statements in the ECIR.
Therefore, the court dismissed any notion that Kejriwal skipped the summonses due to a lack of understanding about the reasons for his summoning.
Additionally, the court stressed that there cannot be separate legal standards for ordinary citizens and public officials like the Chief Minister. The privileges granted by holding a public office do not entitle individuals to special treatment from investigating agencies solely based on their official status.
Clarifying the nature of the legal dispute, the bench held that the case is solely between Arvind Kejriwal and the Directorate of Enforcement, not a conflict involving the Central Government. This distinction is crucial in understanding the legal framework within which the case operates
The Court asserted that it is important to maintain a legal focus devoid of political influence in judicial proceedings. It stated that political factors should never sway the court's deliberations or decision-making process.
The primary role of the Court is to impartially assess presented evidence and apply relevant laws to reach a fair judgment, ensuring that extraneous factors, especially political considerations, do not compromise the pursuit of justice or the integrity of the legal process.
Judicial independence from political influence is vital, with the Court reiterating that its sole responsibility is to uphold laws enacted by Parliament, representing the will of the people. The Court stressed its role as a custodian of justice, focusing on constitutional morality rather than delving into the realm of political morality, which falls outside its purview.
Concluding its judgment, the Court held that judges are bound by law, not politics, and that legal principles, not political affiliations, drive judgments. In the case of Arvind Kejriwal's non-cooperation with the investigation, the Court noted that his arrest was warranted given the circumstances and the urgency of the ongoing trial.
The Court upheld the validity of Kejriwal's arrest and the subsequent remand order, stating that they were not in contravention of the law. Evidence collected by the Enforcement Directorate indicated Kejriwal's involvement in the concealment and use of illicit proceeds, both in his personal capacity and as the Aam Aadmi Party's convenor.

Kejriwal takes legal battle to Supreme Court as Delhi HC upholds his arrest

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712669960092" alt="Rouse Avenue Court issues summon to AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in money laundering case" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Rouse Avenue Court has summoned AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan based on a complaint from the Enforcement Directorate regarding his alleged non-attendance in the Delhi Waqf Board Money Laundering case.
The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), Divya Malhotra, acted on the ED's submissions and initiated proceedings under relevant sections of the law for Khan's non-compliance with summons.
Amanatullah Khan has been directed to appear before the court on April 20, 2024. Special public prosecutor Simon Benjamin represented the Enforcement Directorate in the matter, asserting that Khan's actions had transitioned him from a witness to an accused individual, especially after filing an anticipatory bail plea and evading the investigation process.
The ED's counsel highlighted Khan's repeated avoidance of summons, which hindered the progress of the probe. Benjamin emphasised the gravity of Khan's role in comparison to other accused individuals, indicating a broader involvement.
The recent dismissal of Amanatullah Khan's anticipatory bail plea by the Delhi High Court underscores the principle that elected representatives are subject to the law like any other citizen. The High Court rejected the notion of a separate legal standing for political figures, highlighting the equal application of the law to all individuals.
The High Court's observations pointed out Khan's persistent evasion of ED summons and highlighted concerns over the property transactions under scrutiny, particularly regarding substantial cash payments and contractual employee appointments in the Waqf Board during Khan's chairmanship.
The case revolves around allegations of illegal leasing of ₹100 crore Waqf properties and irregularities in employee appointments during Khan's tenure. With a charge sheet already filed against multiple individuals and a firm, the legal proceedings are shedding light on potential misconduct within the Delhi Waqf Board.
The court's actions and observations reflect a commitment to uphold legal integrity and transparency, especially concerning public figures facing legal scrutiny. The upcoming court appearance on April 20 will be a significant development in this ongoing legal matter.

Rouse Avenue Court issues summon to AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in money laundering case

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712661426693" alt="Kejriwal’s arrest according to law and can’t be termed illegal, says Delhi HC" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Delhi High Court, on Tuesday, rejected Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea contesting his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in the Excise policy case, asserting that Kejriwal's arrest was lawful and could not be deemed "illegal."
Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma's bench stated that the ED possessed substantial evidence justifying Kejriwal's arrest. She also highlighted Kejriwal's non-cooperation with the investigation and the resulting delays affecting those in judicial custody.
According to the material gathered by the Enforcement Directorate, Arvind Kejriwal was implicated in a conspiracy involving the utilisation and concealment of proceeds of crime, both in his personal capacity and as the convener of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).
The court clarified that Kejriwal's arrest and remand should be evaluated based on legal principles, not election schedules, dismissing Kejriwal's objection regarding the timing of his arrest before the General elections due to the lack of malintent on the part of the ED.
Kejriwal's plea contended that the ED failed to prove his guilt under Section 3, concerning concealment, possession, acquisition, or use of proceeds of crime, or presenting it as untainted property.
Arvind Kejriwal was apprehended by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21 in connection to the excise policy case. Subsequently, the trial court extended his judicial custody until April 15, 2024. The ED asserted that the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) was the primary beneficiary of the illicit funds generated in the alleged liquor scam, with Kejriwal playing a direct role in crafting the excise policy.
The case revolves around purported irregularities and money laundering in formulating and executing the Delhi Excise Policy 2022, which was later annulled.
Although Kejriwal was not initially named in the FIRs filed by the ED or the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the Delhi excise policy case, his involvement surfaced in the ED's chargesheet, alleging his communication with Sameer Mahendru, a key accused, instructing him to continue collaborating with Vijay Nair, the AAP communications-in-charge and co-accused.
Nair was among the first individuals apprehended by the CBI in 2022. Following him, former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh were arrested in connection to the case, with Singh subsequently being granted bail by the Supreme Court last week.

Kejriwal’s arrest according to law and can’t be termed illegal, says Delhi HC

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712333504358" alt="Bhagat Singh’s great-grandson criticises AAP's political symbolism amidst controversy" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Yadavendra Singh, the great-grandson of freedom fighter Bhagat Singh, has voiced his opposition to Sunita Kejriwal delivering an address with the portrait of the revolutionary positioned alongside the photo of her imprisoned husband Arvind Kejriwal.
Singh was quoted by news agency ANI, stating, "If we look at the politics of today, it is turning personal. Politics is being done for personal benefit. Any leader should not be compared with him (Bhagat Singh). His contribution was for the country and the society. It wasn't personal.”
Following Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal's detention by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21, his wife Sunita has been issuing video statements while seated in the same chair her husband used for press briefings.
The backdrop of the chair displays portraits of Bhagat Singh and Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. However, during her recent address, a photograph depicting Arvind Kejriwal behind bars was inserted between the portraits of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar, sparking controversy.
Yadavendra Singh further highlighted that if the AAP had mistakenly arranged this setup, they should rectify it by removing Kejriwal's photo from between the portraits of Ambedkar and Bhagat Singh.
Earlier, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) raised objections to the image, accusing the AAP of offending public sentiments.
"Kejriwal is a corruption accused and by putting up his photograph between those of patriots such as Shaheed-e-Azam (Bhagat Singh) and Dr Ambedkar, the AAP has insulted their dignity," BJP's Delhi unit chief Virendra Sachdeva said.
Senior AAP leader Atishi defended the decision, attributing Kejriwal's imprisonment to what she termed as false accusations orchestrated by the BJP-led Centre. "Kejriwal is the symbol of the current struggle against the BJP's dictatorship. His photograph at our offices is to remind us that the struggle against the BJP is no less than the freedom movement," news agency PTI quoted her as saying.

Bhagat Singh’s great-grandson criticises AAP's political symbolism amidst controversy

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712317714437" alt="NIA detains BJP worker in Rameshwaram Cafe Blast Case; Congress questions BJP's role" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

According to media reports, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has detained Sai Prasad, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in connection with the Rameshwaram Cafe blast case. This development follows statements made by two mobile shop workers during their interrogation by the NIA last week, implicating Sai Prasad.
Sai Prasad has been brought in for questioning by the NIA and is reportedly linked to two suspects involved in the Rameshwaram Cafe blast. The NIA had recently conducted raids in Shivamogga, where they searched a mobile store and the residences of the two suspects.
In response to Sai Prasad's detention, the Congress has launched a scathing attack on the BJP in Karnataka. Congress leader Dinesh Gundu Rao took to social media, questioning the implications of the arrest on the BJP's involvement in the Rameshwaram Cafe blast. Rao raised concerns about what he termed as "saffron extremism" promoted by the BJP and its potential impact on public safety.
"With the NIA arresting a BJP worker, does it not imply BJP's involvement in the Rameshwaram Cafe blast? Is there any clearer evidence that the saffron extremism propagated by the BJP in the name of religious protection is causing serious issues? What response does the central BJP, enforcing RSS ideologies nationwide, have to this?" Rao said in a tweet in Kannada.
Rao's tweet in Kannada highlighted the broader ideological clash between the BJP and the Congress, particularly in the context of religious protection and national security. He demanded answers from the BJP regarding their criticisms of the Congress-led state government's handling of the Rameshwaram Cafe blast.
The Rameshwaram Cafe blast, which occurred on March 1 in Bengaluru, resulted in injuries to at least nine individuals. Police sources revealed that the blast was caused by a low-intensity improvised explosive device (IED) triggered using a timer.

NIA detains BJP worker in Rameshwaram Cafe Blast Case; Congress questions BJP's role

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1712317243444" alt="Fatal bomb blast rocks Kannur: Congress accuses CPI(M), investigation underway" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

One person died, and another suffered serious injuries in a suspected crude bomb explosion near Panur in Kerala's Kannur district early on Friday, April 5, according to police reports.
The incident, which took place around 1 am, prompted allegations from the Opposition Congress, suggesting that the blast occurred during the manufacturing of homemade bombs.
Sherin, a resident of Kaivelikkal, passed away while receiving treatment at a private hospital in Kozhikode. The other injured person, Vineesh, lost one hand and is reportedly in critical condition, as per police sources. Both individuals were identified as supporters of the CPI(M) by the police.
Contrary to the police's assessment, CPI(M) state secretary MV Govindan stated that neither Sherin nor Vineesh had any affiliations with the party. He held that the party had distanced itself from the individuals involved.
VD Satheesan, Leader of the Opposition in the State Assembly, held the ruling CPI(M) responsible for the incident, alleging that the party's workers were involved in producing homemade bombs, thereby exacerbating law and order issues during the elections.
Satheesan highlighted a similar incident that occurred in Thiruvananthapuram two days earlier, where two teenagers were seriously injured while allegedly manufacturing a country-made bomb. This incident left one with both hands severely injured and the other with partial damage to one hand, while two others accompanying them suffered minor injuries.
Authorities revealed that all four teenagers, aged between 17 and 18, had a history of criminal involvement in various cases, including theft, drug-related offenses under the NDPS Act, and violations of the Explosives Act.
Speaking to South First, Mannanthala Police Station's State House Officer (SHO) Biju KR mentioned that they were exploring potential motives behind the country bomb production, including whether it was targeted at specific individuals or law enforcement personnel.
The police collected evidence from the blast site on Thursday with the assistance of ballistic experts from the State Forensic Science Laboratory. They also mentioned that the teenagers had been sought in connection with a theft case, which could have led to their involvement in making the country bomb.
As investigations continue, authorities are working to ascertain the motives behind the incident and the roles of those involved, with plans to file a custody application for further interrogation.

Fatal bomb blast rocks Kannur: Congress accuses CPI(M), investigation underway

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711639104906" alt="Major breakthrough in Rameshwaram cafe blast case as NIA arrests key conspirator" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has achieved a significant breakthrough in the Rameshwaram Cafe blast case with the arrest of a key conspirator, Muzammil Shareef, following extensive raids across multiple locations in three states.
The arrest of Muzammil Shareef, identified as a crucial co-conspirator, occurred on Wednesday during coordinated raids at 18 locations, including 12 in Karnataka, five in Tamil Nadu, and one in Uttar Pradesh.
The NIA had taken over the case on March 3 and had earlier identified Mussavir Shazeeb Hussain as the main accused who executed the blast. Another conspirator, Abdul Matheen Taha, also identified by the agency, remains at large and is wanted in connection with other cases.
According to NIA investigations, Muzammil Shareef provided logistical support to the two main accused involved in the IED explosion at the Cafe situated on ITPL road, Brookefield, Bengaluru, on March 1.
The blast resulted in injuries to several customers and hotel staff members, some of whom sustained severe injuries, besides causing extensive damage to the property.
During the raids, NIA teams conducted searches at the residences of the three accused and other suspected individuals, seizing various digital devices and cash. The agency stated, “Efforts are on to nab the absconding accused and unearth the larger conspiracy behind the blast.”
This development marks a significant stride in the investigation, shedding light on the intricate web of individuals involved in the planning and execution of the tragic incident at Rameshwaram Cafe.

Major breakthrough in Rameshwaram cafe blast case as NIA arrests key conspirator

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711622896963" alt="Kejriwal calls Delhi LG's statement a political conspiracy" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

A day after Delhi's Lieutenant Governor maintained that the city's administration will not be controlled from prison, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal labelled it a "political conspiracy" and predicted that "the people will respond."
Just moments before his court appearance on Thursday, Kejriwal addressed Saxena's statement, denouncing it as part of a larger political plot. He said that the public would offer a fitting response to such political manoeuvres.
Arvind Kejriwal, the national convener of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), was taken into custody by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21 in connection with a money laundering case linked to Delhi's excise policy. He was subsequently held in ED's custody until March 28 by a local court.
Despite calls for his resignation, AAP leaders have consistently maintained that Kejriwal will continue to oversee the government's affairs even while in detention.
In response to LG Saxena's statement, Kejriwal asserted that his administration wouldn't be governed from behind bars, setting the stage for a potentially contentious political standoff.

Kejriwal calls Delhi LG's statement a political conspiracy

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711551184440" alt="Delhi HC denies relief to Arvind Kejriwal in excise policy case, sets next hearing date" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court rejected Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea for relief concerning his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the excise policy case.
The court granted the ED seven days to respond and scheduled the next hearing for April 3. Kejriwal had approached the Delhi High Court, arguing that the ED's actions infringed upon his fundamental rights.
In his plea, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief asserted that the ED had failed to prove his guilt. Kejriwal's legal team argued, "The DOE has at the time of arrest has failed to establish that Petitioner is guilty of committing activities stipulated under Section 3, i.e., be it one of concealment, possession, acquisition, use of proceeds of crime as much as projecting it as untainted property or claiming it to be so.”
Kejriwal also criticised his arrest without being questioned, implying a premeditated and political motive behind the proceedings.
Earlier on Wednesday, Kejriwal's wife Sunita released a video message, stating that her husband would reveal significant information regarding the alleged excise policy scam in court on March 28 and provide evidence.
During her meeting with Kejriwal in ED custody, Sunita was told that the central agency had conducted over 250 raids related to the "so-called liquor scam" in the last two years but hadn't found "a single paisa" in any of them so far.
Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 by the ED in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case, which is linked to a money laundering investigation. He was remanded to the ED till March 28. The case involves alleged irregularities and money laundering in framing and implementing the Delhi excise policy in 2022, which was subsequently scrapped.
Former Deputy Chief Minister Sisodia and AAP's Rajya Sabha MP Singh were arrested last year in connection with the Excise Policy case, while former minister Jain was arrested in a separate money laundering case.

Delhi HC denies relief to Arvind Kejriwal in excise policy case, sets next hearing date

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711109341266" alt="Explainer The Delhi Liquor Policy Case and the alleged scam that surrounds it" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Excise policy, implemented on November 17, 2021, was crafted based on recommendations from an expert committee. Its primary objectives were to boost government revenues and dismantle the influence of the liquor mafia, curbing black market activities. This policy introduced a significant shift, as it initiated open bidding for 849 liquor vends, which were subsequently awarded to private companies. To ensure fairness, the city was divided into 32 zones, each granted a maximum of 27 vends, and the bidding process took place zone by zone.
With the implementation of this new excise policy, the city government's involvement in the liquor business ceased entirely. The government relinquished control over liquor sales in the capital. Despite the government's assertion that the policy aimed to ensure equitable distribution of liquor vends across the city, it faced criticism from various social, educational, and religious groups. The timing of its introduction, amid the challenges posed by the second wave of the Covid pandemic, exacerbated the situation for the Delhi government. Consequently, the policy was rolled back in July 2022, and the previous liquor policy was reinstated.
<ins>The controversy</ins>
The controversy surrounding the liquor policy began when allegations emerged, suggesting that the AAP government had granted unwarranted financial benefits to liquor licensees long after the tenders had been awarded. These actions were alleged to have resulted in substantial losses to the government's treasury. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) initiated an inquiry into these allegations, focusing on potential advantages provided to private retailers.
The CBI has gone further, asserting that corruption in this matter implicates high-ranking officials within the Kejriwal-led government. They have alleged that substantial kickbacks amounting to crores were exchanged for favourable treatment under the policy, with these funds purportedly finding their way into the AAP's election campaign in Goa the previous year.
Adding to the controversy, a report dated July 8, 2022 from the Chief Secretary of Delhi indicated apparent violations of various regulations, including the GNCTD Act 1991, Transaction of Business Rules (ToBR) 1993, Delhi Excise Act 2009, and Delhi Excise Rules 2010.
In response to this report, Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena took decisive action, ordering an inquiry into the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22. His recommendations, made on July 22, 2022, included urging the CBI to investigate potential breaches of rules and misconduct during the implementation of the excise policy.
<ins>Manish Sisodia’s arrest</ins>
The report made damning allegations, asserting that Manish Sisodia, the Minister In-charge of the Excise Department, not only took but also executed significant decisions and actions. These actions were deemed to be in clear violation of statutory provisions and the officially notified Excise Policy, which carried substantial financial implications. The report contended that these decisions were motivated by the sole objective of benefiting private liquor barons, in exchange for financial gains that reached individuals at the highest levels of government, culminating with Minister Manish Sisodia himself.
In August 2022, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed an FIR in a special court, citing allegations that crores of rupees had been purportedly disbursed to close associates of Sisodia by Sameer Mahendru, the proprietor of Indospirits. Mahendru had been intricately involved in irregularities during the formulation and implementation of the excise policy.
The arrest of former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia represents one of the most significant developments in this ongoing matter. Sisodia was taken into custody by the CBI on February 26, as part of its investigation into alleged irregularities related to the framing and implementation of the Excise Policy of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Subsequently, in the following month, Sisodia was arrested once again, this time by the Enforcement Directorate, which was probing allegations of money laundering in the same case.
<ins>South Group</ins>
In its inaugural prosecution complaint presented to the court, the ED has alleged that Vijay Nair, the head of communication for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), received kickbacks totalling ₹100 crore on behalf of AAP leaders from what has been referred to as the "South Group," a term used in statements provided by various individuals during the investigation.
The CBI identified prominent figures within the South Group, including Sreenuvasula Reddy, his son Raghava, and Kavitha.
Arun Ramachandra Pillai, a businessman, was apprehended by the ED on suspicions that he was one of the three primary representatives associated with BRS MLC K Kavitha.
In addition to Pillai, two other representatives linked to Kavitha were reported to be Abhishek Boinpally, the proprietor of a beauty salon chain, and Chartered Accountant Gorantla Butchibabu.
<ins>Kickbacks </ins>– money paid to somebody illegally in return for work or help
The investigative agency also revealed that, as part of their agreement, the South Group made advance payments to AAP leaders through Vijay Nair in the form of kickbacks. In return for these kickbacks, the South Group gained unrestricted access, received undue privileges, and acquired shares in established wholesale enterprises and multiple retail zones, surpassing the limits stipulated by the policy, as outlined in the CBI's charge sheet.
To recoup the kickbacks, the South Group's partners were granted a 65 percent ownership stake in Indo-Spirits, in collaboration with Sameer Mahendru, the company's proprietor. Nair orchestrated this partnership arrangement with the assurance of granting Indo-Spirits the wholesale business of Pernod Richard.
According to the investigative agency, the South Group manipulated Indo-Spirits' shares through deceptive practices, concealment, and the use of proxies.

Explainer: The Delhi Liquor Policy Case and the alleged scam that surrounds it

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1711107576272" alt="Arvind Kejriwal withdraws Supreme Court petition against ED arrest due to remand hearing clash" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has opted to withdraw his petition from the Supreme Court challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) at his residence. This arrest is related to the Delhi excise policy case, which has been entangled with allegations of money laundering.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, informed a two-judge bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna about the withdrawal of the plea. Singhvi cited the clash between the plea and the ongoing remand hearing by the ED in a trial court as the reason behind this decision. He expressed the intention to address the remand hearing and return to the Supreme Court later.
In response, Justice Khanna remarked, "You need not be present, you may go there," signalling that Kejriwal's presence at the remand hearing was necessary.
Singhvi mentioned that he would submit a letter to the apex court Registry officially withdrawing the plea.
=========================
Also Read - <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/8b768817-6ecb-40db-a831-4aa1a09c1805/telangana-cm-daughter-k-kavitha-summoned-by-ed-in-delhi-liquor-scam-case" target="_blank">All you need to know about the alleged Delhi Liquor Policy Scam</a>&nbsp;
=========================
Earlier on the same day, the apex court had agreed to hear Kejriwal's plea against his ED arrest promptly. A special bench consisting of Justices Sanjiv Khanna, MM Sundresh, and Bela Trivedi was designated to handle the matter.
Initially, Singhvi had sought an urgent hearing before a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud. He expressed concerns about the potential incarceration of senior leaders if legal processes continued unchecked.
Subsequently, the Chief Justice directed Singhvi to present the plea before a special three-judge bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna which was concurrently addressing the plea of BRS leader K Kavitha against her ED arrest in the liquor policy case.
=========================
Also Read - <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/76443dfd-1e8c-490d-b680-f2192e147efd/anna-hazare-express-disappointment-over-kejriwals-arrest-calls-it-outcome-of-personal-actions" target="_blank">What did Anna Hazare say about Kejriwal's arrest</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;
=========================
Kejriwal's petition arose following his arrest by the ED, stemming from the agency's ongoing investigation into alleged corruption and money laundering surrounding the formulation and implementation of Delhi's excise policy for 2021-22, a policy that was ultimately annulled. AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh are currently in judicial custody in connection with this case.
The ED has repeatedly mentioned Kejriwal in its chargesheets, alleging that he was in communication with certain individuals regarding the excise policy, leading to undue advantages for them in exchange for kickbacks paid to the party.

Arvind Kejriwal withdraws Supreme Court petition against ED arrest due to remand hearing clash

Seems like those who are sharing The Preamble as a mark of protest against Shri Ram Pran Pratishtha ceremony knows nothing about the Preamble, or the Constitution, or Secularism itself.
People are arguing that the construction of Ram Mandir goes against the ‘Secular’ ideals of Preamble. My question to them - was India not secular before 1976, the year when the word was added? Bharat was secular long before the concept was even emerged, but just for the sake of the argument, let’s not delve into the history here.
The Constitution, through Art 25 to Art 28, makes India a secular nation. So, if a large sect of the population is exercising their fundamental rights, how does it threaten the secular ideals of the Preamble? Mind you that the Mandir is built after the orders of the Supreme Court, following the Constitution, and the ideals enshrined in the Preamble.
People are also using the words of the Preamble like ‘Justice’, ‘Liberty’, ‘Equality’, and ‘Fraternity’ to support their baseless agenda. In a welfare state set-up, these words refer to Socio-economic Democracy, which is backed by Political Democracy (‘Sovereign’, ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’, ‘Democratic’, ‘Republic’).&nbsp;
You tell me, how does the second largest majority do not enjoy socio-economic democracy? Is the State discriminating against them through its laws or policies? Did the State pass the RamJanmabhoomi Judgement? Is the State interfering in their religious aspects? The answer is No!
On the contrary, one can make a solid case that when it comes to practicing religion and personal faith, the second largest majority have more rights (no State control over mosques, but there is State control over temples; the absence of a Uniform Civil Code).
Lastly, the Shri Ram Pran Pratishtha ceremony was a ‘Religious’ event. Therefore, by definition, something religious can not be secular. How can you apply secular logic to a religious event? Would you tolerate if religious logic be applied to something secular?
Now, some might say, if it was a religious event, then how can a politician/PM can take part? The answer is simple – construction of Ram Mandir was in BJP’s manifesto. They promised it to the voters. Is there anything wrong in fulfilling promises? PM Modi is also the supremo of BJP, and more importantly, Ram Mandir is an important religious cause for him too. Does he not have the right to exercise his fundamental rights, and practice his faith? He is also a citizen of Bharat.

Debunking Misconceptions: Ram Mandir, Secularism, Preamble, and Constitutional Values

Archaeological Survey of India’s (ASI) report on Gyanvapi premises will be made public and its access will be provided to both sides.

This report will surely going to turn many heads, and break even more hearts <a href="/hashtag/iykwim">#iykwim</a>

Big update on the Gyanvapi issue.

<div>Gone are the days when if a train accident happened, one would think the reason was some human error or sub-standard infrastructure.</div><div> </div><div>Now one thinks whether accident happened because of some sabotage.</div><div> </div><div>What are views about the recent tragedy involving derailment of NorthEast express in Buxar district if Bihar?</div><div> </div><div>Just around 10 days ago, a Vande Bharat's train journey was sabotaged in Rajasthan. Unknown people put stones and metal rods on the train track which could have led to a major accident had the train not been stopped.&nbsp;</div>

How times have changed | For better or for worse?

Here are some articles on the Delhi Liquor Scam case

<ol>
<li><a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/1318a5d9-e451-4717-9435-4d2bb949d8dc/aaps-sanjay-singh-arrested-delhi-excise-scam-links-exposed" target="_blank">AAP’s Sanjay Singh arrested – Delhi Excise Scam links exposed</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/fd4e3988-af9f-42f6-b291-dc7ff646670d/delhi-liquor-scam-businessman-arun-pillai-turns-approver-alongside-five-others" target="_blank">South Group exposed – Delhi Liquor Scam explained</a>&nbsp;</li>
<li><a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/8b768817-6ecb-40db-a831-4aa1a09c1805/telangana-cm-daughter-k-kavitha-summoned-by-ed-in-delhi-liquor-scam-case" target="_blank">Telangana CM daughter, Kavitha, summoned by ED in Delhi liquor scam case</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>

Some articles on the Delhi Liquor Scam Case

<ul>
<li>Zahoor Mistry - IC-814 hijacker (Shot dead in Karachi)</li>
<li>Ripudaman Singh Malik 1985 Air India bombing (Shot dead in Surrey)</li>
<li>Mohammad Laal - ISI Operator (shot dead in Nepal on 19 Sep 2022)</li>
<li>Harvinder Singh Sandhu - 2021 RPG Attack on Punjab police HQ (died of drug overdose at a hospital in Lahore)</li>
<li>Bashir Ahmad peer- HM Commander (Shot dead in Rawalpindi)</li>
<li>Syed Khalid Raza - Al Badr Commander (killed in Karachi)</li>
<li>Imtiyaz Alam - (Hizbul Commander killed in Rawalpindi)</li>
<li>Ejaz Ahmad Ahangar - (ISJK, shot dead in Afghanistan.)</li>
<li>Syed Noor Shalobar - (Shot dead in Bara Khyber, Pakistan)</li>
<li>Paramjit Singh Panjwar - KCF Chief (shot dead in Lahore on 6 May 2023)</li>
<li>Avtar Singh Khanda - (Died due to suspected poisoning in Birmingham, UK on 16 June 2023)</li>
<li>Hardeep Singh Nijjar - (shot dead outside a gurdwara in British Columbia, Canada on 19 Jun 2023)</li>
<li>Sardar Hussain Arain - (Succumbed to shot wounds in Nawabshah, Sindh on August 1, 2023)</li>
<li>Khalid Saifullah (LeT Cdr shot by unidentified gunmen in Kasur, Punjab, Pakistan on August 12, 2023)</li>
<li>Riaz aka Abu Qasim Kashmiri So Muhammad Azam (LeT Commander shot dead inside Rawalkot mosque in PoJK on 8th Sept 2023)</li>
<li>Sukhdool Singh aka Sukha Duneke, (Shot dead in Winnipeg, Canada on 20th Sept 2023)</li>
<li>Ziaur Rehman (Hizubl Mujahideen leader shot dead in Karachi in Sept 2023)</li>
<li>Mufti Qaiser Farooq (Aide of Hafiz Saeed, shot dead in Sohrab Goth, Karachi, Pakistan, Oct 2023.)</li>
</ul>
Iam sure the list goes on and on. All the men listed here have been shot dead by unidentified gunmen or poisoned or died due under questionable circumstances.
well no one can say for sure whether R&amp;AW is behind this or not, bcz if someone can say for sure, then whats the point of having secret intelligence agency.

What do you think? does R&amp;AW really play a part?&nbsp;&nbsp;

Anti-India people who have 'allegedly' died at the hands of R&AW.

in the aftermath of India-Canada debacle, the leader of the banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, has issued threats to Canadian Hindus and asked them to leave Canada claiming that they have adopted a “jingoistic approach” by siding with India.

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695192254624" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>


in the video titled “Leave Canada, Indo-Hindus, Go India”, Pannu said, “Indo-Canadian Hindus, you have repudiated the allegiance to Canada and the Canadian constitution. Your destination is India. Leave Canada, go to India.”

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695192263744" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>


he later talks about a referrendum which will happen on 29 Oct, seeking to blame Indian High Commissioner Verma for Nijjar's murder.

Threats to Indo-canadian hindus in Canada

first that loudmouth Udhayanidhi gave those bad statements about Sanatan Dharma

and now this&nbsp;

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1694698737431" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

a govt university in TN is asking its students to prepare a speech about eradicating sanatan dharma. and i thought the state cant give religious instructions to an educational institute.

Giving religious instructions can still be tolerable, but to target a specific religion is not acceptable. what is happening?

WTF is happening in Tamil Nadu?

Niti Aayog has prepared an ambitious plan to develop Varanasi &amp; adjoining districts on the lines of NCR.&nbsp; <div> </div><div>Varanasi | Ghazipur | Jaunpur | Chandauli | Mirzapur | Bhadohi</div><div> </div><div>Work on this plan to start from next month.</div><div> </div><div>Initial proposals include:</div><div> </div><div><ul><li>Regional rail for faster intercity connectivity </li><li>New industrial clusters along National Highways </li><li>Trade center for handicrafts &amp; GI tagged products </li><li>Automobile manufacturing hub </li><li>Logistic parks along major railway routes </li></ul></div><div> </div><div>This is how a Yogi ji is developing UP.&nbsp;</div>

Good news for Uttar Pradesh

Three security force officers, including an Army Colonel, were killed in a gunfight with terrorists in Kokernag area of Kashmir's Anantnag district.
Colonel Manpreet Singh, Major Ashish, deputy superintendent of Jammu and Kashmir Police Humayun Bhat were critically injured in the gunfight and died later. Bhat died due to heavy blood loss.
The operation against the terrorists began on Tuesday evening in Gadole area, but was called off during the night. This morning, the hunt for the terrorists resumed after information started trickling that they were spotted at a hideout.

You get to see these incidents on regular basis.

Has Kashmir really changed for good?

Just another day at the office in JnK - 3 security force officers were killed in a gunfight 

असम के मुख्यमंत्री हेमंत बिश्वा सरमा ने आज कहा कि जल्दी ही असम में Semiconductor plant लगाया जायेगा.. जिसमें Initial investment होगा लगभग 40,000 करोड़ का.<div> </div><div>असम ने पिछले ही महीने Semiconductor मैन्युफैक्चरिंग के लिए PLI policy भी approve कर दी है... यह करने वाला असम चौथा राज्य है.... पहले तीन गुजरात, उत्तरप्रदेश और ओड़िशा हैं.</div><div> </div><div>असम में पानी की कोई कमी नहीं, जो Chip मैन्युफैक्चरिंग के लिए बहुत जरूरी है...... साथ ही Transport connectivity भी अच्छी है.....6 Airports हैं.... Train Connectivity भी है.. और धुबरी से बांग्लादेश होते हुए Bay Of Bengal तक पोर्ट connectivity भी है.</div><div> </div><div>अगर असम यह कर लेता है... तो यकीन मानिये... पूरे North East की किस्मत हमेशा के लिए बदल जायेगी.</div>

अगा यह हुआ तो Assam (and North East) के लिए बड़ी जीत। 

<div>what are your views on the violence happened in haryana and parts of NCR?</div>

Communal riots in Haryana

attack planned by pakistan killed 5 of our soldiers, how do you think India will retaliate?
Can we expect another surgical strike?

How do you think India will retaliate to the recent attack in Poonch?

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1682091764871" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

I think they don't realise that this is not the India of the past that they can do anything they want or scare us with threats like these. I say bring it on.&nbsp;

I think they don't realise that this is not the India of the past 

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1682091364371" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

This is why he gave that scripted interview. He knew that CBI is coming after him, so he spoke non-sense about the whole Pulwama attack tragedy.
Now he can claim Modi sent CBI after him bcz he gave that interview.

And this is also the strategy adopted by Delhi's Kejriwal. He has been vocal about PM's degree, and how the current PM is just 4th passed. He knows that he is next in line after Sisodia, Jain, and other AAP members, so he is doing everything he can to shift the blame.&nbsp;

Opposition now knows how to hedge

Im seeing people on social media getting angry about the new rules to appoint the chief election commissioner. whats the problem?

whats the problem with a committee to decide the CEC?

Discover comprehensive analyses, discussions, and insights on the dynamics shaping our nation's politics, economy, culture, and society at Policharcha. Stay informed and engaged with diverse perspectives on crucial national issues